He was answering the question, "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?" It was posted with this classic (and unfortunately typical) picture of Donald Trump with former British Prime Minister Theresa May.
Here's what Nate White wrote:
"A few things spring to mind.
Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally
esteem.
For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no
credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no
sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all
qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously
blessed.
So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s
limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.
Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has
never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever.
I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not
once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British
sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.
But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand
what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a
casual act of cruelty.
Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he
never laughs; he only crows or jeers.
And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he
actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty
prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.
There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or
depth. It’s all surface.
Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.
Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.
And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath.
All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver
Twist.
Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact
opposite of that.
He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.
He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.
And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the
British: a bully.
That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly
transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.
There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules
of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a
gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the
belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks
them when they are down.
So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of
Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think 'Yeah,
he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little
distress to British people, given that:
* Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
* You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.
* Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
* You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.
This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British
people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.
After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him
speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being
artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit.
His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.
God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and
plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or
nastiness so stupid.
He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.
In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled
entirely from human flaws - he would make a Trump.
And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls
of hair and scream in anguish:
'My God… what… have… I… created?
If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed
set."
Dear Jim,
ReplyDeleteI always look for your opinion column in the Transcript. Usually I agree with your thoughts, but I do want to say that I feel Michelle Obama would not be the right candidate for the Vice President in the upcoming election. Michelle is a wonderful mother, successful lawyer and mentor, fantastic First Lady, important role model and so many other things, but I feel she does not have the legislative experience that I think we need to support the Biden Presidency. Personaly, I hope Biden picks Kamilla Harris as his running mate. She is experienced, a multiracial woman, a WestCoast representative, articulate, etc. Given Biden's age(similar to mine) I have concerns about his ability to withstand the stresses and terribly challenging expectations of a President in the coming years. Is it possible he would consider passing the baton to Como or another youngish liberal? I don't know.
Thanks for your work. Yours truly, Esther Macalady, Golden Please change this address to esthermacalady@gmail.com