In the past, I have joined other analysts in characterizing Trumpers and those Republicans who have fallen under his spell as driven by racism.
While racism is clearly a dominant theme, the larger theme motivating Trump Republicans, as I see it, is intolerance. (Note: Not all Republicans are alike in their opinions, just as not all Democrats are alike. Consider the following as reasoned generalizations.)
Republicans are intolerant of immigration, often railing against “white replacement” by people of color and the culture of diversity. Democrats see America as the “melting pot” and see immigrants as the people who built America from the beginning. Most of us are children of immigrants. My observation from studying first generation immigrants such as Jacob Riis, Nikola Tesla, Andrew Carnegie, Albert Einstein, Henry Kissinger and others, is that they are more driven to succeed and live the American dream and more appreciative of our freedoms and our free enterprise system than those of us who are, happily, in the position to take America’s freedom for granted.
Republicans are intolerant of government and taxation, whereas Democrats recognize the need for government and for taxes to fund government services. That doesn’t mean that Democrats accept corruption, malfeasance and waste in government, although Republicans often portray them that way. Democrats would like to minimize taxation, but not at the expense of important social services.
Republicans are intolerant of progressive taxation and “income redistribution,” whereas Democrats support higher tax rates for the wealthy and consider addressing poverty a matter of “social justice.” Republicans opposed Social Security until it was too popular. They opposed Medicare and Medicaid until they were too popular. They opposed the Affordable Care Act, but that, too, is fading now that “Obamacare” is gaining in popularity. Democrats would move faster toward such things as universal healthcare, higher minimum wages, and other social justice issues, but Republicans still get political mileage (for now) by labeling such efforts “a radical socialist agenda.” If voters understood and appreciated how such policies would benefit them and have made the Scandinavian countries the happiest populations on earth because of their socialist policies (and high taxes to support them), then that Republican strategy would not be as successful as it is, but Americans who would benefit from such programs are, sadly, underinformed and easily manipulated by politicians who appeal to their other intolerances such as of people of color.
My biggest fear is that social media and right-wing “news” networks such as Fox have allowed 30-40% of Americans to be protected from real news and voices that don’t play to their insecurities and intolerances.
I think it was in the book How Fascism Works, by Jason Stanley, himself the son of immigrants from Nazi Germany, that the author noted that democracy, because of its freedom of speech, contains within it the seeds of its own destruction, and we are definitely seeing that play out, thanks to Trumpism. (Please read that book!)
Other intolerances exhibited by Republicans include universal voter registration and easy ballot access. Our diversifying population is terrifying to white males, who see easy ballot access as a death sentence for white supremacy. Democrats don’t fear a universal franchise, they welcome it.
Republicans are intolerant of non-Christian religions and voters, while ignoring Jesus’ teachings about serving the poor and needy. They are intolerant of diverse sexual orientations and preferences and of a woman’s right to choose. The list goes on. As I said, the dominant theme is intolerance.
I’m not a psychologist, but I’m of the belief that intolerance is built on insecurity. Republicans are made insecure by the growing presence of diverse races and religions in our “melting pot.” Insecurity is a close cousin of fear. Republicans build their intolerant base by playing to their fears, whether economic, social, or other. My fear is that they’ll succeed.
My thanks to the readers who support this column through my GoFundMe campaign at www.FundTalkingTurkey.com.
Some
time back a woman living in Sweden, “Caroline” @SweResistance on Twitter, posted a thread
that said:
“I
live in Sweden. We have social security, affordable health care, strict gun
laws, 5 weeks paid annual leave, 1 year maternity leave, etc. And no,
we're not a communist country, and not even strictly socialistic but
socio-democratic. And our freedom is not inhibited.
“For
example, health care can cost a maximum of around $130 per year for visits to
health care centrals etc., hospital nights costs $12 per night with a $175
roof per month. Prescription drugs have a yearly roof of $250.”
Sweden
is a democratic republic that practices an economic system often referred to
as “democratic socialism” or “social democracy.” Although Karl Marx
popularized the word “socialism” in 1848 to describe his proposed utopian
economic/political system, outside of the realm of Marxists and rightwing
cranks, Marx’s system is usually today referred to as “communism” and
“socialist” is the modern tag used to describe countries like Sweden.
As such,
it’s describing an economic system made possible by the political system of
democracy. Swedes have what they have because the majority of their
population has repeatedly voted for politicians who promised to put
democratic socialism into place.
And it’s
not just Sweden. Norway, Denmark, Iceland and Finland have remarkably similar
systems in place, and the rest of the European Union isn’t far behind.
Nobody
in any of those countries, including the entire EU, will ever, for example,
go bankrupt because of medical debt, something that happens to over a million American families every single year.
Nobody
who has the ability and wants to go to college or trade school is turned down
and, outside of a few private universities, education is not just free or very cheap in most all of Europe but
many countries pay a subsidy or monthly stipend to students to cover the
cost of rent, food and books.
Swedes
and the residents of most of the rest of Europe have voted for democratic
socialism because their political system is largely open, voting is not
restricted, and wealthy interests find it much harder to corrupt politicians
than here in the US.
As the
Nordic Council of Ministers notes on their website about, for example, Sweden: “Everyone who is
entitled to vote and who is registered in the Population Register in Sweden
is automatically included on the electoral roll (röstlängden) and receives a
voter card by post.”
This is true of all the Nordic countries and most of
the rest of Europe: if you’re a citizen you’re automatically enrolled to vote
when you turn 18 and voting is super-easy whether it’s done at a polling
place or by mail.
Here in
America, the majority of people would very much like an economic system like
Europeans have, particularly the Scandinavians.
A recent Harris poll asked, “Do you support a
proposal that would make public colleges, universities and trade schools free
for all and cancel all student debt?” Americans said “Yes” by a 58% to 42% margin.
Europeans
enjoy higher wages and radically less income and wealth inequality than
Americans for two main reasons:
Second,
taxes in Europe in general, and Scandinavia in particular, are often above 50% on the morbidly rich
and many countries have an added annual wealth tax on the billions those same
people have accumulated.
The
answer is actually pretty straightforward: “Conservative” billionaires and
the Supreme Court they created.
Ever
since Lewis Powell wrote his 1971 Memo on how the morbidly rich
could seize total political and cultural control of America — and Richard
Nixon put him on the Supreme Court the following year — rightwing
billionaires have spent hundreds of millions of dollars to get their people
on the Supreme Court, elect “conservatives” to Congress and in state
legislatures, and influence public opinion.
In 1976,
Powell’s Supreme Court in
Buckley v Valero ruled that when billionaires pour so much money
down the throats of individual politicians that they essentially own them,
that’s not bribery or corruption as we’d thought of it since 1776 — instead,
it’s First Amendment-protected “free speech.” Two years later, in First National Bank v Bellotti 1978, the Court ruled the same was true of
corporations, and doubled down on both decisions in 2010 with Citizens United.
By the
Reagan Revolution of 1980, the GOP had been entirely subsumed by the money of
the morbidly rich and big corporations, and in the 1990s quite a few elected
Democrats joined their ranks (and continue to support them by opposing ending
the filibuster, for example).
“[These
Supreme Court decisions] violate the essence of what made America a great
country in its political system. Now it’s just an oligarchy, with unlimited
political bribery being the essence of getting the nominations for president
or to elect the president. And the same thing applies to governors and U.S.
senators and congress members. So now we’ve just seen a complete subversion
of our political system as a payoff to major contributors, who want and
expect and sometimes get favors for themselves after the election’s over.”
“Conservative,”
though, doesn’t just describe people who want to use their riches to own
politicians who will, in turn, keep their taxes low by depriving the American
people of the “nice things” we’d mostly all like to have. It also
describes racist white supremacists both among the conservative billionaire
class and the Republican base.
It was
“conservatives” who fought against the abolition of slavery prior to the
Civil War, and who fought every attempt at Reconstruction or Civil Rights
legislation from 1865 to today. They did so in the name of
“conservative principles,” which white supremacists have fought to preserve since
the founding of our republic.
And one
of the main ways they maintain their political power is by using a system
unique to America, started after the failure of Reconstruction in 1872, of
“selectively registering” voters, “purging voter lists,” and putting up
barriers to reduce voting by anybody who’s not white.
To
maintain white supremacy post-1872, most states developed elaborate systems
requiring “undesirable” people to jump through multiple hoops to register to
vote, to vote, and even to ensure their votes are counted and they can stay
on the voter rolls. This Jim Crow vestige of Confederate ideology now
pollutes our ability to vote in most of our states.
No
European country has anything that even vaguely resembles this byzantine
labyrinth people must navigate to become eligible to vote and have their vote
counted.
Meanwhile,
as Lee Fang reported, Republican politicians and the billionaires who own
them are now dropping any pretense at all to caring
about the fate and future of our country’s fiscal health, so long as they get
their tax cuts now.
Conservative
billionaires, who know if we can all vote we’ll soon raise their taxes and
give ourselves healthcare, education and good pay, are funding voter
suppression efforts in every state in the union as well as challenging voting
rights at the Supreme Court.
This is
also why they fund rightwing TV & radio networks and “news” websites to
freak out white people about “Black Lives Matter and Antifa” so the white
majority in America will be so terrified of Black and Brown people they’ll
keep putting corporate- and billionaire-shills into office.
Most
Democrats in Congress, impeded both by Republicans and a few of their own
members who’ve sold out to these dark-money interests, are trying to break
the stranglehold conservative billionaires have on American politics through
their dark money.
The For The People Act takes a good
first step in this direction, although reshaping the Supreme Court itself is
probably going to ultimately be necessary to break dark money’s stranglehold
on our political system.
If we
ever want to have the “nice things” enjoyed by average Scandinavians and
Europeans, it’s going to take one huge lift to break the filibuster and get
legislation like the For
The People Act into law.
Modern
democracy began in 1789 in America, but “conservatives” have fought a truly
multiracial democracy every step of the way, particularly as low-wage workers
and racial minorities have struggled to gain equal representation and equal
rights.
It’s a
tragic commentary that countries like Sweden that initially emulated us have
now become more “free” than we have…just because rightwing billionaires here
have so successfully mobilized racism as a political strategy.
Americans deserve better, and the only thing standing in the
way is a group of billionaires who’d rather shoot themselves into outer space
than let unions into their workplaces or pay reasonable taxes…and can pay
politicians and stack our courts with racist judges to keep it that
way.
I make a practice of watching Fox News to see how that network’s news division portrays the day’s events. (I consider the network’s evening opinion shows — Carlson, Hannity and Ingraham — a waste of time.)
The Fox shows I watch the most are America’s Newsroom in the morning, Special Report in the late afternoon, and Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace on Sunday.
These shows make an effort to be “fair and balanced,” but they do include interviews with right-wing commentators who are prone to making outrageous statements that are rarely challenged as they should be by the anchors -- except for Chris Wallace.
I remember in particular listening to one of those weekday programs prior to Nov. 3rd on which a guest referred to “the communist wing of the Democratic Party.” What, pray tell, constitutes the communist wing of the Democratic Party?Did the anchor not ask because “everyone knows”? Is it simply an accepted fact that there is a communist, not just a socialist or leftist, wing of the Democratic Party?Is it “the Squad”?
I’d like to see Fox News Channel define these terms instead of just throwing them around, leaving the interpretation to whatever the audience chooses.
What’s ironic about this is that the same party which, under the influence of Donald Trump, no longer treats the communist former Soviet Union as an enemy, applies the communist label to the Democratic Party.
Donald Trump’s singular accomplishment as president has been his fulfillment of Vladimir Putin’s desire to make Russia great again. How? By diminishing America’s role and prestige around the world.One can identify several ways in which Trump has served the interests and goals of Vladimir Putin.
First and foremost, Trump has weakened the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization by (1) supporting Brexit, and (2) failing to express support, when asked, of Article 5 of the NATO treaty which says that an attack against one member is to be treated as an attack against all members.
That article has only been invoked once — in response to the 9/11 attack on the United States. It was because of Article 5 that NATO members joined the United States in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Trump’s failure to criticize Putin or Russia, first by calling Russia’s interference in the 2016 election a “hoax,” has been reinforced more recently by his failure to acknowledge or criticize Russia’s payment of bounties to Taliban fighters who kill American soldiers in Afghanistan and Russia’s current cyber attack on American government and industry computer systems.
Making Russia great again depends largely on making America less great, and that is accomplished by creating dissension and chaos on an unprecedented scale within America. Trump has demonstrated his expertise in that task, dividing America as it has never been divided before.
What has made Trump’s work in this regard so effective is that the side he has chosen to take is that of the well-armed alt-right racists and white supremacists, who are themselves experts at creating violent encounters with counter protestors, creating a vicious cycle of extreme divisiveness. Death threats are their stock in trade when they aren’t actually killing those who dare to oppose their Supreme Leader. Think, for example, of the Georgia Secretary of State and poll workers in several states who have received death threats for doing their jobs and telling the truth. Think also of Eric Coomer, the security chief at Dominion Voting Systems, who is living in hiding because of threats against his life for allegedly masterminding a feature of his company’s voting machines to change Trump votes to Biden votes.
Back now to the claim that leaders of the Democratic Party are communists, socialists and leftists. What is the evidence? Medicare for all? In that case, Canada, the UK, Scandinavia and most European countries are communist, or at least socialist. Are those countries not democratic? Do they lack freedom and liberty?
What those countries have is a more equitable and socially stable country, where taxes are higher but so is the quality of life for the middle class. As for “lower classes” and homeless, those are less of a problem in those countries, where it exists at all. What they don’t have are 530,000 families declaring bankruptcy every year due to medical bills they can’t pay.
My sister Janet lives with her Swedish husband Staffan north of Stockholm.Last month, Staffan underwent a 5-hour surgery for a defective heart valve. It was a surgery which has been performed several times in America, but it was the first time it had been performed in Sweden. The hospital flew in a cardiologist from Atlanta and experts from other countries to participate in the surgery. The bill to Staffan and Janet was 500 Swedish krona, equal to 60 American dollars.
In America, someone with that condition might have chosen to live with the symptoms and die earlier rather than face financial ruin for his family. That, unfortunately, is the American way.
And what about the Green New Deal? It is portrayed as socialist, but it is a job-creating program to address the global threat of climate change, which is already resulting in stronger hurricanes and other severe weather, flooding and droughts, record forest fires and rising sea level. (Did you hear about the Antarctic ice shelf the size of Delaware which broke off this year?)
Before the 2016 election, we heard about the issue of “low information voters” who are easily manipulated by politicians. Compound that with organized disinformation of the kind perfected by Russia and magnified by today’s social media and right-wing “news” sources such as One America News and Newsmax, as well as by QAnon.
The fact that the majority of Trump voters believe the election was stolen by Joe Biden testifies to the power of disinformation on the part of a trusted leader. The only reason there is a low level of trust in our electoral system is that Donald Trump has not accepted defeat. If he had conceded, that level of mistrust simply wouldn’t exist.
Putting aside what that says about the mental state of our current president, consider what it says about our fellow citizens. As a whole, we seem to be a pretty ignorant and easily conned bunch, don’t we?
A final thought: It has been reported that White House staffers are concerned about the president's mental health, given his recent actions and his questionable pardons. If Trump gets demonstrably crazier, perhaps his cabinet will get together and invoke the 25th Amendment to remove him from the presidency before he can do more damage.
I have done exactly what Donald Trump has asked of every American since he came down that gold escalator in June 2015 — to think only about him day and night.
The books I read before going to bed each night? They are all about Trump. The email newsletters I read between my real estate newsletters? All about Trump. The news programs and specials I watch every evening and on Sunday? Mostly about Trump.
This is how he likes it, and it has been exhausting for me and I suspect also for you. I look forward to ignoring him starting in 2021.It will drive him nuts.
As I sit down to write this 28th and final “Talking Turkey,” it’s a challenge to do more than breathe a hopeful sigh of relief that our long national nightmare is coming to an end — and peacefully so. Here are my closing thoughts.
First, it’s apparent to me that Donald Trump’s two “winning arguments” are that he is against abortion and that Joe Biden is a Trojan horse for a radical left “Democrat party” that will destroy America through socialism and communism/Marxism. A third argument, that he inherited a bad economy from Obama and made it great, is hardly worth discussing. His shameful tax cuts for the wealthy, which gave crumbs to the middle class, merely supercharged the already healthy economy he inherited and massively ballooned our national debt, benefiting only Wall Street.
The argument about socialism also deserves dismissal. The programs that are identified as “radical left” and “socialistic” — Medicare for All and the Green New Deal — are essentially ones that have been in place for years or even decades in Canada, the United Kingdom and most European countries. We are laggards in adopting them.
Regarding abortion, I have pointed out that being pro-life is something Trump only adopted to court evangelicals and is not a core belief.He was a pro-choice Democrat in New York.
I have gotten the impression that people cite opposition to abortion as their reason for supporting Trump, using it as a cover for their unspoken support of white supremacy and anti-black and brown immigration. This is particularly true for the evangelicals, because there are so many non-Christian aspects of the man they are required to overlook.
After all, why would someone opposed to abortion support a President who separated babies from their mothers as a method of discouraging refugees and immigrants, encouraged rally-goers to beat up anti-Trump demonstrators, and said that the white supremacists included "many fine people," not to mention supports the killing of adults (i.e., the death penalty)?
As we all know by now, there are countless lies and conspiracy theories, many of them by QAnon, charging various Democrats (especially Trump’s guilty pleasure, Hillary Clinton) with crimes. Here’s the question I keep asking those who believe the charges of crimes by Democrats: If these stories were true, it is totally within the power of the Republican-controlled Senate to hold hearings on them. Why don’t they hold those hearings? Obviously it’s because public testimony would prove them to be false. It’s more useful politically for McConnell and Trump's other enablers to keep those lies circulating on social media instead of providing an opportunity to disprove them.
Most Trump supporters agree he’s a terrible human being, but there are some who think he’s “a good man,” citing an urban legend about him paying off the mortgage of a black man who changed a flat tire on his limo. It was totally disproved on snopes.comin 1998, but when I informed a Trumper of this, his response was predictable: “Snopes is owned by George Soros” (another urban legend). Trump supporters simply can’t handle the truth.
Assuming (again, hopefully) that Donald Trump is defeated next week and his sycophantic majority in the Senate evaporates, Trump will cease to hold the sway that he has held over Republicans, and “the truth will out.” It may take time for his hard core alt-right white supremacists to withdraw into the shadows where they resided before Trump emboldened them to “unite the right” as they did in Charlottesville. The majority of Trump supporters will, I believe, follow the path of Germans after Hitler’s downfall and come to realize how badly they were duped and misled by the worst president in American history. It will take a while, but it will happen. America is too strong to fall. We will recover.
