Search This Blog

Showing posts with label FHA Loans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FHA Loans. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Home Buyers Can Save by Purchasing Before FHA Fees Go Up on April 1st

[Published March 1, 2012, in the Denver Post]


      A quick check of Metrolist, the Denver MLS, shows that about 30% of homes purchased for $400,000 or less are financed with an FHA-insured loan. These loans are popular because they require only a 3.5% down payment.

      FHA interest rates are comparable to those for conventional loans, but extra fees are charged, both upfront and monthly, for mortgage insurance premium (MIP). These fees replenish FHA’s reserves, which have been depleted by the high number of foreclosures on FHA-insured loans in recent years.

      There is a 75% increase in the upfront fee for those FHA loans initiated after April 1, 2012. This upfront payment, which is currently 1% of the loan amount (and can simply be added to the principal), increases to 1.75%. Thus, on a $300,000 loan, this added principal amount is currently $3,000, but will increase to $5,250 on an FHA loan initiated in April, adding about $11 to the monthly mortgage payment in the above example (based on a 4% interest rate).

    Currently, the monthly mortgage insurance premium is 1.15% annually (1.1% when the down payment is 5% or more), and this fee increases by 0.1% to 1.25% and 1.2% respectively.  Thus, on the same $300,000 loan, the monthly MIP payment is currently $287.50 (assuming 3.5% down payment), but goes up to $312.50, an increase of $25 per month.

That $25 increase, unlike the $287.50, does not go to the FHA. Instead it goes to the Social Security Trust Fund. As noted in my Jan. 12th column, this increase is mandated by the Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011, which was passed in December. That act reduced the Social Security tax for just two months, but is charged to new borrowers for the next 10 years. Doesn’t seem fair, does it? 

On their website, HUD calculates that the average FHA borrower will pay only $5 more each month for that additional mortgage insurance premium, but I don’t see how they could come up with such a low estimate.

The monthly MIP must be paid for 5 years, regardless of the percentage down payment, but can be removed once the homeowner can document 20% or more equity.

Current FHA loans, and loans initiated before April 1, 2012, are not subject to these higher fees.

Conventional loans are also affected by an increase comparable to that $25 per month, but it will be reflected in the loan’s interest rate instead of appearing as an additional fee. 


Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Supply of Homes for Sale Is Being Depleted; We Need More Homes on Market

[As published on Jan. 19, 2012, in the Denver Post]

The statistics speak for themselves. Right now there are 31% fewer homes for sale on the Denver MLS than there were at this time last year.  In the non-foothills portion of Jefferson County, the inventory of homes for sale is down 39% from a year ago. 

Despite fewer homes to choose from, the number of homes under contract is up by 13% from last year.  Thus, the percentage of inventory that is under contract is 27.5% vs. 18.8% a year ago.  In Jeffco, that percentage is even higher.

The bottom line message could not be clearer.  If you are thinking of selling your home, there is no better time than now to put it on the market.  We need inventory!

Buyers are buying right now, and for a very good reason.  The interest rates are at record lows. Look at these rates offered by a lender with whom I do business:  30-Yr Fixed—3.75% (Jumbo* 3.875%)  15-Yr Fixed—3.0% (Jumbo—3.125%)  5/1 ARM—2.125% (Jumbo—same rate)  FHA 30-Yr Fixed—3.75% (no points)

The above rates all include one point, except for FHA. If you want to pay no points on the non-FHA loans, the rate is 0.25% to 0.375% higher. 

As a guide, each 1% change in rate on a $250,000 loan saves or costs the borrower about $50,000 in interest over a 30-year term.

Not only should sellers consider putting their home on the market at this time, but buyers should get off the fence and buy before rates go up. Remember, you can buy a home with as little as $1,000 down in Colorado, thanks to the Colorado Housing and Finance Authority (CHFA). If you don’t have a good lender, I’d be happy to refer you to one.  Call me at 303-525-1851.

*A “jumbo” loan is a loan over the conventional loan limit of $417,000. 

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Mortgage Cost Increase to Pay for 2-Month Extension of Payroll Tax ‘Holiday’

[Published in the Denver Post on Jan. 12, 2012]


It was big news in December that the House Republicans caved in and agreed to extend the federal payroll tax “holiday” for two months, as agreed by Senate Republicans.

But what didn’t make the news was where the money would come from to pay for that tax reduction.  It’s going to come out of the pockets of homebuyers in the form of increased loan costs.

I was first made aware of this by a Jan. 5 email from a respected mortgage consultant. I confirmed it this past Sunday in a conversation with Rep. Ed Perlmutter in Golden.

The mortgage consultant wrote: “For conforming products, it has been determined that something known as a Guaranty Fee that all lenders pay to the Government Sponsored Entities [Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac] will increase by 10 basis points in yield. Effectively, that means all conforming loans will increase almost .125% in rate. [Fannie and Freddie] are requiring this increase for loans delivered to them beginning in the second quarter of 2012. You will see the increase effective on Wednesday, Jan. 11, 2012. In some cases, the actual rate impact will be as little as 27 basis points. In other cases, the impact will be as high as 77 basis points. And the impacts will vary day-to-day, depending on the rates and the market’s attitude.” (A basis point = 1/100th of 1%.)  

FHA loan costs will go up by an equivalent amount.

According to Rep. Perlmutter, you can thank the Republicans for this development.  The Democrats wanted to pay for it with a tax on those earning over $1 million per year, but the Republicans would not allow it and, to honor their no-tax-increase pledge, came up with this non-tax approach to providing the required offsetting revenue. According to the email I received, it will take 10 years for this mortgage cost increase to offset that two-month payroll tax reduction.

I’m amazed that Republican leaders continue to think they can attract votes from the general population by doing whatever it takes to keep taxes low for the top 1% of the population.  I suspect they are only providing ammunition that will cost them in the 2012 elections.

I lived in Washington, DC, when I was a reporter for the Washington Post in 1968. I’m keenly aware that the 550,000 residents (mostly Democrats) of our nation’s capital do not have voting representation in Congress.  DC’s license plates declare “Taxation Without Representation.”  Wasn’t that the rallying cry at the Boston Tea Party?   Why isn’t today’s Tea Party working to right that injustice?

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Condo association must take action so that members can sell their units!

[from my Dec. 22nd column published in the Denver Post]


FHA loans fill an important gap in the financing of low-end homes, especially condos, because FHA requires only a 3.5% down payment.  And here in Colorado, the Colorado Housing Finance Authority (CHFA) will loan first-time home buyers all but $1,000 of that 3.5%. But first the condo project must meet FHA approval on a few key factors.

First, if fewer than half the residents are owner occupants, forget about using an FHA — or even a conventional — loan.

Secondly, FHA and Fannie Mae look at the financial strength of the condo association.  If more than 15% of units are behind on their monthly dues, forget about getting a loan on any unit in that complex. 

Third, no single investor can own more than 10% of the units.  And there are other criteria that must be met by the condo complex.

Until February of last year, it was possible to get a “spot approval” to sell a condo by satisfying these and other criteria for the loan underwriter.  However, since February 2010, the condo association itself must obtain certification from the FHA before any unit in that complex can get an FHA loan, even if those criteria would be satisfied.  It takes time and it takes money for the association to get that approval, and many — indeed, most — condo associations have been lax is obtaining that certification.  Moreover, certifications expire and the association must re-apply.  Many have not.

For example, in Lakewood’s ZIP 80228 (the Green Mountain area), there were 18 approved condo associations a couple years ago, and now there are only six.  In ZIP 80229, ten out of 12 are no longer certified — and not because they wouldn’t qualify if they applied.

Now that FHA loans are the only way that a significant percentage of home buyers can finance a home, and since condos are the most affordable way for most buyers to become homeowners, this failure by condo associations to obtain and renew their FHA certifications has potentially disastrous consequences for all current condo owners.  If units can only be sold to cash buyers or with private financing, the values of the units are bound to fall.  If you are a condo owner, pressure your association to get and remain certified with the FHA — assuming it qualifies.

Moreover, even if your condo association maintains its FHA certification, if other complexes don’t, they will affect your complex to the extent that they produce lower comps for your units.

I thank Norm Lewis of Peoples Mortgage (303-910-1629) for educating me on this topic.
Your are encouraged to add your own insights to this issue below!